8th and 14th US Amendments of the Constitution

 --> breaking down

Due Process does not apply no those who did not commit felonies or crimes, therefore these amendments can not be argued to sway one direction.

[decision was reached by the supreme court regarding teachers who hit their students]

The Rule of Law

habius corpus

From the book:

"             The Right to Personal Freedom" 

Page 200 - "Liberty is not secure unless the law, in addition to punishing every kind of interference with a man's lawful freedom, provides adequate security that every one who without legal justification is placed in confinement shall be able to get free." - Habeus Corpus Acts.

ORIGINS OF PREVENTIVE CONFINEMENT IN ANGLO-AMERICAN LAW,

THE ENGLISH EXPERIENCE

THE 'DANGEROUS OR INCHOATE ACT' APPROACH UNDER WHICH SOCIETY CAN INTERVENE BEFORE A CRIMINAL ACT HAS CAUSED ACTUAL HARM. THIS RATIONAL SERVES AS A BASIS FOR ATTEMPT,  CONSPIRACY, AND SOLICITATION CRIMES.

'

THE DANGEROUS PERSON APPROACH'

 IT DOES NOT REQUIRE THE COMMISSION OF ANY SPECIFICALLY 

PROSCRIBED PAST ACT AS A CONDITION TO INTERVENTION. A PERSON MAY BE CONFINED BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN PREDICTED THAT HE MAY COMMIT A DANGEROUS OR HARMFUL ACT AT SOME FUTURE TIME. MOST SUCH PREDICTIONS WILL, 

IN FACT, BE BASED UPON SUSPICION THAT THE PERSON COMMITTED CERTAIN PAST ACTS; BUT THESE ACTS GENERALLY NEED NOT BE PROVED; NOR NEED THEY HAVE BEEN PROHIBITED BY LAW. 

Religion and Law - Magna Carta referenced in 1774 in The Congress prayers during the War of Independence. The Reverend, Jacob Duche was elected the body's first chaplain on 

July 9th 1776. One year later he defected to the British. Then in 1777, the Congressional Chaplain was appointed in a form a joint sectors of denominations of a religious body.

This was the revolutionary policy which was followed by the first Congress under the Constitution on April 15th, 1789. "Seperation of Church and State". 

Required this practice to be continued.

Great Britain in the Peace Treaty of 1783

1785 Congress debated regulations for settling the new western lands--stretching from the Alleghenies to the Mississippi--

Regulations included reserved suppprt of schools and for the support of religions when new township was laid out. Profits from those two instances would be applied

"according to the will of the majority"

State financial support to a church to be controlled by one deomoniation of was speculated, but majority voted out the idea.

The Atheist's Bible - Age of Reason - Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology by Thomas Paine in 1694 (sits in Liberary of Congress)

- Shed light on the nature of "virgin birth" (Jesus). Calling it infidelity, and blasphemous in its own degree .

 The New Testament

Matthew 1:18-25 explains that Mary and Joseph 

were engaged, but only married after she had borne a son, which Joseph named Jesus.

The fact that Luke 1:26-38 entertains the idea of this process being already decided that it would be a very normal (and natural birth process which just opens a whole room of second thoughts) despite its Holy Spirit overshadowing with the power of the Most High, allowing the Son of God. "for nothing is impossible with God"

These both make no sense due to the culture at this time that you can not be engaged unless you are under 12 or have had experienced the first menstral cycle. (according to events described in the gospels)

According to their customary tradition, the wedding would take place a year later, and the groom would move out of his father's house and bring the bride to his own home.

To reference this Age of Reason book's message,  this would show that Joseph was a cuckold, and Joseph wanted this infidelity act to take place.

Under the tribunal laws, they both would be stoned to death for mutually committing adultery.

Thankfully these are the he two only mentions of this type of birth in the entire Christian corpus.

The rest is just "she a virgin and then she jesus was here"

This story mixing on just the Bible side shows incentives to draw attention and reliability to the Roman Senate, who have at the time declared Julius Caesar a God, and that Augustus, was to be the "Son of God".

Worth noting Caesar created Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The entire mathematical structure of ceaser ciphers were based on his encryption

which are still used today (ROT13, etc), and Augustus was known for to be his unrelated nephew, and the heir to the thrown, and went by Octavian.

Octive functions serve as a divisor when coding function of quantities, and is used in C+ programming of complex mathematics, allowing taskflows and other stuff I didn't care to read into.

Ceaser was first manipulated into a coup of Lesbos by revolting against Rome. However, the details later are still unclear but show evidence it was a Rome funded operation to overthrow the Mytilene island to a Roman Republic that was also joint with the propaganda to create the war.

It resulted in a pardon on top of being awarded the "Civic Crown".

Then he came, saw, and conquered.

The 60 members of the Roman Senate who stabbed Ceaser 23 times ruled it as a tyrannical succession, and started the downfall of more and more Tsars'.

The first known autobiographer was in the Roman Senate and was a dark satirical poet, predicted this eventual outcome for the Roman Empire .

This Atheist's Bible shows that this story of Jesus was manipulated to appeal to the Roman Empire's doomed future and their people, and was used as a means to take advantage of a structure that was pending a need for change, because with each

violent delight, we tend to result in a violent end. [The Crusade] The need to fill a void with something not too different, but not too similar and a comfort for this normality shift to remain as fast as the equilibrium of our vessels as we venture through time and space.

The case of children being beaten not allowed to be used as a violation of the 8th amendment was due to the fact that felonious crimes were not committed therefore allowing the

Supreme Court to find a reason to allow these children to be beaten. For a reference, felonies are decladed by the federal government as it its the Supreme Law of the Land. 

Therefore, when a state crime that they deem a felony is brought to a federal court, specifically the Supreme Court, the context of who is commiting the felony was required to be the

focus. If I were holding over 2.5 ounces of marijuana in Arizona, I would get a felony.

In Alaska, if I had up to 4 ounces, there is no law to punish me.

Now lets say since the federal government decided it was a Schedule I drug, which they also placed diacetylmorphine and after failed government testing on lysrgic-acid, and endogenous chemicals we already posses like Dimethlyntyptamine, they also 

decided to throw that [Tetrahyrdocannibold9] in there, along with various drugs with medical benefits, or no toxic effects.

This is the supreme law of the land, and when it comes to an actual decision on what crime was committed, the law of the land must use their resources to fund a prosecution charge against a resident in a "protected" state.

 If any officials  that are not federal are discovered to have played a single role in the charges, the case must be dropped. 

State governments are restricted by HIPPA, among other laws that are federally placed to prohibit patient records to be put into a public domain. If you are arrested in Texas for an abortion, the resources provided to the arresting officer must be exclusive to this discovery basis. The federal government does give grants to various community outreach centers that deal with direct information anonymously structured data on patients, practically indexing in whatever capacity they deem to allow more funding for more people to unknowingly give their

private information away. If it is discovered, or even speculated that any federal agencies took part in discovering what certain private clinics were practicing or performing, the illegal abortions the charges would be dropped, and then liability and damages are on the table.

As we learned from the 14th Amendment, and Bush v. Gore (2000),Title 3 CHAPTER 1 § 5

Code § 5 uses the basis that if any state has enacted a law prior to the date fixed for the determination of any controversy on an judicial procedural outcome.

That means, 6 weeks before trigger laws begin in the USA, before we can't dispute it on the 14th Amendment being violated by the previous administration's appointed officials along with the 8th being a reason.

There is also a very strange understanding with charts. America US rates went from a calculated resource and debt crisis, to a delayed resource and debt crisis by cutting the birth

rates down to 2.1 (still above what was the legal limit in China for decades). China has allocated resources and abundance of food to serve their population of two billion for more than two years. Rumors and speculation seem likely that they will use it to bribe leaders in Europe.

The USA has enough in reserve to feed our population of a few hundred million for less than half of a year.

Where does the idea of using a very confusing birth story that was meant for Roman unevolved beliefs show any reason to rationalize these state laws that will create felons out of these potential [if they had the abortion or planned to] mothers and fathers, and in the process leave that child

to be more dependent on a non socialist society that won't look twice at a homeless minor, who in turn would get assaulted, and then arrested if they attempt to stop the process

if the assault was sexual in nature. This seems like a very sadistic and calculated culling on an ugly cycle.. The only evident factor is that the people who were given the privilege to make this decision, are not nearly as educated as the Supreme Court's logical determinations on a controversial regressive lawmakers. It shows that there was something in the baby formula from Nestle they released in the early 80s after all, or that hairspray that caused a hole in the sky also did some brain seepage to the people who are serving God, or the people of the United States... whatever their dice land on today.

God Bless America, and reform, not regress.